NVIDIA Force Driver 15.35 Windows 7

Popular drivers from NVIDIA
Force Driver infromationVersion: 15.35 WHQLRelease Date: 2009.05.11Operating System: Windows 7 64-bitLanguage: English (U.S.)
Release highlights: Ethernet Driver (v73.06) WHQL Network(Network driver) Management Tools (v73.05) "Sedona" SATAIDE Driver (v11.1.0.23) WHQL SATARAID Driver (v11.1.0.23) WHQL RAIDTOOL Application (v11.1.0.23) SMU Driver (v1.67) WHQL Installer (v7.01) Support products nForce 7 series: 790i SLI, 790i Ultra SLI, 780i SLI, 740a SLI, 710a, 750i SLI

AMD ATI Radeon HD 3200 Graphic Card Winows 7 and Driver Download

The AMD ATI Radeon (Mobility) HD 3200 is an onboard (shared Memory) graphics chip (on the RS780M chipset). It is based on the HD 2400(ATI Radeon HD 2400 ) graphics core and features the UVD video engine to decode HD videos (Avivo HD).
Hybrid CrossfireX is a new feature of the chipset, that allowes to use the onboard HD 3200 graphics core in conjunction with a dedicated graphics card of the Mobilty Radeon HD 3400 series) in Crossfire combination to increase the performance (similar to GeForceBoost / HybridSLI of Every frame is rendered by a different graphics core with this technique.
PowerXpress is used to save current if the HD 3200 is used with a dedicated graphics card of the HD 3000 series. The driver is able to dynamically switch between the onboard graphics (for low demanding tasks like office) and the dedicated graphics core for demanding tasks (e.g., games).
The UVD video engine is able to decode HD videos (MPEG-2, H.264, and VC-1) in all stages and allows the fluent playback of HD videos (e.g. Blu-ray) with a relative low CPU utilization (called Avivo HD). The HD 3200 was the first onboard graphics card that allows the fluent playback of Blu-ray videos. The UVD on the HD 3200 supports the decoding of one video stream only. A second stream (e.g. on Blue Rays with PIP feature) has to be done by the CPU.
The graphics core of the HD 3200 stems from the Mobility Radeon HD 2400 and is therefore DirectX 10 capable. Because of the missing graphics memory, the performance of the card is a bit lower than of the HD 2400. Theroretically, dedicated memory chips can be directly added to the chip, making it a dedicated graphics card. Because of pricing it is unclear if any manufacturer will add memory to the chip.
Still older games like Doom 3 or Quake 4 should be barly playable. Compared to older onboad graphic chips (e.g., GMA X3100), the HD 3200 is much faster. Even the Centrino 2 graphics core (GMA 4500M HD) is noticeable slower than the HD 3200.
Related AMD ATI Radeon HD 3200 Driver Download
AMD ATI Radeon HD 3200 Display Driver v.9.6

Intel open sources graphics card drivers1

Traditionally, graphics cards manufacturers were wary to reveal the source code for the drivers with their GPUs. According to researcher Jon Peddie, the information contained within these drivers’ source are “family jewels”, and likely contain information about how the chips themselves work. ATI doesn’t want NVIDIA knowing these secrets, and vice versa. So it comes as a bit of a surprise that Intel has just recently open sourced its software that lets Linux users fully control the interopterability between their system and Intel’s new 965 Express Chipset.
This isn’t the first time Intel has open sourced software about its chipset, including other graphics processors. In fact, it has been releasing open source versions of its drivers in collaboration with Tungsten since its i810 processor. However, the move is important, since Intel’s 965 chipset would be the first chipset that works with Linux capable of producing high powered 3D graphics, with features such as OpenGL vertex shading, and hardware transform and lighting The goal of Intel’s open-sourcing move was to bring more Linux users to purchase the hardware. According to Dirk Hohndel, the chieft technologist with Intel’s Open Source Technology Center, "Having open-source drivers gives us a big edge in this market”. Before, most Linux users only had very limited options when choosing how to interface with their graphics cards. They could use proprietary (private, un-open sourced) software drivers to interface with their GPUs. However, this practice is all but banned by the Gnu General Public License (GPL), the open source standard in the Linux community, making it very difficult – both practically and ethically – for kernel developers to support it. As a result, more than a few Linux systems do not support proprietary drivers. Without proprietary licensing, Linux users could utilize user created drivers. Although good, they often aren’t great: they usually have major flaws or bugs, mostly stemming from the fact that the users who create the software do not have complete knowledge of the hardware and operability of the graphics cards, since much of that information is being kept secret. Intel’s open sourcing move will likely make its chipsets popular in the Linux graphics community. It will finally mean that they can use the real driver code to interface with their GPUs without worrying that some no-knowledge programmer accidentally left dangerous bugs or holes in the code, or that their kernel would not be supporting proprietary drivers in the next release (as Novell recently did). How this will make Intel’s two major graphic rivals react is unclear. Both NVIDIA and ATI have released statements on Intel’s move. NVIDIA made it clear that “at this time” they see no need to move to open source, but they might consider it later. ATI will probably be taking this a lot more seriously, though. Having been recently acquired by AMD, Intel’s Silicon Valley arch-rival, ATI will be looking closely into ways it can stay ahead of Intel. This might mean that soon, both Intel and ATI GPUs will be fully open sourced and available on Linux machines. This will hopefully make 3D DCC applications, as well as high powered 3D games, available to run well on the Linux platform. Hopefully it will, since Linux offers many benefits to the Windows or Mac operating systems that stem from its open-source nature (one being that it can be free!). Of course, only time will tell. If Intel chipsets are the only ones to have their drivers open sourced, it may not be enough for game designers and DCC companies to make the move.

Intel PRO/Wireless 3945ABG Driver Linux

This project was created by Intel to enable support for the Intel PRO/Wireless 3945ABG Network Connection adapter. This project (IPW3945) is intended to be a community effort as much as is possible. As with our other wireless adapters, there are some working constraints related to documentation we can make publicly available.

The 1.1.0 stable version (any version ending in .0 is 'stable') is available from page.

If you would like to try a newer unstable/development version, first view this and then look below for links to download and use the development snapshots available from this project.
As always, please send feedback, bug reports, feature requests and any fixes you come up with. Please let us know which distribution you use this with, and any problems you encounter.

Realtek HD 2.16 Audio Driver Windows 7 Download

Realtek HD 2.16 Audio Driver for Windows 7 Download
The Realtek HD audio driver version 2.16 is now available for Windows 7, XP and Vista.
Realtek HD Audio Driver support all of Realtek HD Audio Codec in Vista/WinXP/Win2000/Win2003.

Vista WHQL Supporting: ALC882, ALC883, ALC885, ALC888, ALC889, ALC861VD, ALC660, ALC662, ALC663, ALC665, ALC260, ALC262,ALC267, ALC268, ALC269, ALC272, ALC273, ALC887

Windows 2000/XP WHQL Supporting: ALC880, ALC882, ALC883, ALC885, ALC888, ALC889, ALC861VC, ALC861VD, ALC660, ALC662, ALC663, ALC665, ALC260, ALC262, ALC267,ALC268, ALC269, ALC272, ALC273, ALC887
HDMI Device WHQL Support: ATI HDMI Devices

OS Supporting: Microsoft WindowsXP, Widnows2000, Vista, Windows7 x86/x64
Pack with Microsoft High Definition Audio UAAV1.0a(5013)
Add/Fix 1.) Driver : 1. Customizations. Realtek HD Audio Driver for Win 7

Intel PRO/Wireless WiFi Link Drivers Windows Vista

Wi-Fi Driver Versions:
- Intel WiMAX/WiFi Link 5350: 12.4.0.21 (Old version:
Intel WiMAX/WiFi Link 5150: 12.4.0.21- Intel WiFi Link 5300: 12.4.0.21 (Old version:
Intel WiFi Link 5100: 12.4.0.21 (Old version:
Intel Wireless WiFi Link 4965AGN: 12.4.0.21 (Old version:
Intel PRO/Wireless 3945ABG Network Connection: 12.4.0.21 (Old version:
NOTE: Use the EXE file for automated driver installation. Otherwise, you may manually extract and update your wireless driver with the ZIP package. Intel is a supplier of laptop components and does not manufacture or sell complete laptop systems. The software provided by Intel below is a generic version. Each laptop computer original equipment manufacturer (OEM) may have altered the features, incorporated customizations, or made other changes to the software or software packaging they provide. The software provided has not been verified by your laptop manufacturer as to compatibility or other operation. Intel or the laptop computer original equipment manufacturer (OEM) may not provide technical support for some or all issues that could arise from the usage of this software.

Operating in 802.11n Mode Intel recommends using security with your wireless network. The Intel(R) Wireless WiFi Link 4965AGN adapter can only achieve transfer rates greater than 54 Mbps on 802.11n connections when using AES security, or no security. You should only use no security when setting up or troubleshooting the network. To enable AES for Personal Security, select WPA-Personal (AES-CCMP) or WPA2-Personal (AES-CCMP) in the Security Settings pulldown menu. To enable AES for Enterprise Security, select AES-CCMP in the Data Encryption pulldown menu. Wi-Fi Protected SetupWi-Fi Protected Setup is supported only on the 3945ABG Network Connection, the Wireless WiFi Link 4965AGN, and Wireless WiFi Link 4965AG_. Linksys Access Point Association TimeoutAfter the association flow completes, the adapter stays awake (as in CAM mode) for 10 seconds, and then acts according to the PowerIndex (PI) regkey. PI should not be change during this period. The association timeout is 10 seconds. Using the Linksys access point, association occurs every 60 seconds, resulting in deauthentication and disconnection from the Linksys access point. Intel My WiFi PAN Operation in the 5.2GHz BandThe Intel My WiFi PAN will operate over the 5.2 GHz band (802.11a) only when the Intel My WiFi STA station is connected to an access point that is operating over channel 36, 40, 44, or 48 (5.2 GHz). Intel My WiFi PAN Device Reconnection After Profile Security Changes In some instances a PDA may fail to immediately reconnect to the Intel MyWiFi Technology network after the profile security is changed from one security setting to another. Engineering Release Notes - WoWLAN is not supported with NETBIOS packets on Microsoft Windows Vista. This is expected to be fixed by Microsoft at SP1.- When the driver is uninstalled, the default setting loads the Microsoft Windows Vista inbox driver.

Adding Intel Matrix Drivers to Your XP Image for AHCI SATA

It seems like people have had trouble getting some of the newer models of machines working in native SATA AHCI mode. I'm referring to the infamous STOP 0x0000007B INACCESSABLE_BOOT_DEVICE BSOD. My goal with this article is to consolidate all the fixes, information, and tips I have come across on this topic, and to provide a process that can be followed to support AHCI mode in your XP image. The workaround most people tend to use is to turn off SATA support in the BIOS and run in IDE mode. The IDE drivers are natively supported in XP and don't require you to make a new image for support. This works for some people while others would rather be using the AHCI SATA support to receive the full performance benefits. This article is for the latter.

NOTE: This information is not to fix your PXE problems. You must have your MSD and NIC drivers working in the pre-boot environment before you worry about getting your XP image to work. There are many articles on Juice and in the AKB about driver support for PXE with DOS, WinPE, and Linux. This article assumes you already have PXE working with your hardware.
Before you start, it is also worth noting the new feature of DS 6.9 SP1 called DeployAnywhere. This should allow you to get around having to create a new image to support your MSD. If you aren't using DS 6.9 SP1 yet, or if you just want to fix your image like me, then you can follow the process in this article.

Typically the IDE mode performance degradation isn't visible to the end user. Recently we received a new HP laptop model where this wasn't the case. Since I needed to re-build our image for XP Service Pack 3 anyways, there was no better time to integrate the Intel Matrix Storage drivers into the image. Due to the fact the vast majority (if not all) PC manufacturers are using the Intel Matrix Storage drivers, this article includes how to add support for all versions Intel offers to date. This same process will work to support new controllers beyond ICH10 as they are developed.
Download iata87enu.exe and run the following command to extract the files:iata87enu.exe -A -P C:\extract\IMver8

use Intel's driver website

In this comprehensive tutorial we will walk you through the process of finding and installing the hardware drivers for your Intel Gigabit Ethernet Controller. This is a vital part of your operating system. If the Ethernet controller is malfunctioning, you are unable to access the Internet or the local connections.

Although it might seem simple to troubleshoot problems related to this device, it is not. Sometimes, the cause of some problems remains hidden. We might encounter situations where IT experts have a lot of work to do before finding and solving the problem.
Here are a few real problems from real people all around the world:
"Hi guys! I have some problems with my Ethernet controller, I don't know how to upgrade/install the right drivers, and I know that my motherboard is the ASUS A7V8X ... but I am having problems finding the right drivers, can anyone help me? Thanks!"
"Hi there. I recently had to reformat and reinstall windows XP, and amongst some of the problems that have surfaced since is that I no longer have the Ethernet controller for my pc. I have an XP 2200+ with an Albatron KX400-8XV Pro motherboard. I am looking for the Ethernet controller driver. The CD that I used when I built the PC has long gone. Any advice as to where I can find it. I've looked around the INTEL website but don't seem to be able to find it"
"Hi I have the "HP Media Center m7160n Desktop PC" and currently I just reformatted my system. After I reformatted I tried connecting to the internet and I kept on getting an error. So I went to device manager and noticed that my Ethernet controller is not recognized and that the driver needs to be updated. But to do that i need to connect to the internet. So if anyone can help me out with what to do that would be very helpful. (And I bought my system almost 2 years ago so I don't have the recovery disk anymore). Any help that you can offer is appreciated. Thanks in advance."

As you can see, after installing the operating system, there are many problems that appear out of nowhere. We must solve these problems if we want to use all of our computer's resources. I have an Intel 82540EM Gigabit Ethernet Controller and Windows can't see it. I have lost my original CD with the drivers. What can I do? Let's see!

Intel Reviews

Information of Intel Processors and Motherboards

Intel Core 2 Duo 'Conroe' E6600, Reviews

Core 2 Duo or "Conroe" as it is code-named has been one of the most anticipated product launches in the hardware community for quite some time. Everybody has been waiting to see if Intel can claim back the performance crown and push under the rug the disappointment that was the NetBurst architecture. The string of Pentium 4/NetBurst products that Intel released had so many faults that I won't embarrass Intel by listing them. Put simply, NetBurst never reached the potential Intel believed it was capable of. However, financially it did very well as Intel is incredibly good at marketing, while AMD seems happy to sit by as the underdog expecting PC enthusiasts to do all its advertising for it.

On a number of occasions I've had the opportunity to play with Pentium M on desktop motherboards and it has been the closest experience yet to re-creating my Mendocino Celeron A overclocking days. So naturally, I have been looking to Conroe with anticipation.
Conroe is nothing like any previous Pentium 4 products. In fact, it's based on the mobile Core Duo design which is in itself based on Pentium M, which is based on Pentium 3 architecture. So Intel has actually done a bit of a U-turn.

Compared to Pentium 4, Core Duo (not to be confused with Core 2 Duo) offers low power consumption, low waste heat and high performance per clock. This is almost an exact opposite to the Pentium 4 which used so much power that the ATX specification had to be modified to add more 12V rails, and produced so much heat that they often throttled and made reaching 4GHz almost impossible. Not only this, but clock for clock performance wasn't stellar – hence the need for higher clock speeds in the first place. The resultant disparity between AMDs and Intel's clock speed was one of the primary reasons for AMD introducing PR ratings (eg. 5000+) so that consumers didn't feel like they were getting a raw deal.

Core 2 Duo is the next generation on from Core Duo. Although we have tested the desktop "Conroe" version of the Core 2 Duo processor here today, there will be a mobile version code-named "Merom". Although this will be architecturally identical, it will have better power saving technology for extended battery life. AMD's biggest selling point has been its on die memory controller. This has had a lot of knock on effects (such as almost identical performance from motherboard to motherboard), but the main effect is a huge reduction in memory latency as communication is no longer passed through the north bridge. This, in combination with HyperTransport reduced the bottleneck of the front side bus. Memory performance affects system performance significantly, so Intel processors were suffering in this area a lot.

Intel's solution to this is several minor improvements to the Core architecture in order to reduce this memory latency and increase overall system performance. Most of these optimisations are quite minor, but put together add up to more than the sum of their parts. Quite frankly, how Intel has improved their architecture so much is largely irrelevant - performance figures tell us all we need to know.
Possibly the biggest improvement is an added pipeline. Where as Core Duo can complete three instructions per cycle, Core 2 Duo can now complete four which an obvious increase in processing
power and efficiency.
To help reduce bottlenecks, the front side bus has been increased to 1,066MHz from the 800Mhz that all but a few of processors used. This is at a base frequency of 266MHz, quad pumped.

If it wasn't completely obvious, the "Duo" portion of the name indicates that these are dual-core processors. Unlike previous Pentium D processors, these use a shared Level 2 cache (2MB or 4MB depending on the processor). This can be dynamically allocated depending on the task being run. For instance, if running an application that isn't multi-threaded (i.e. can't take advantage of a second core), then the primary core would get the full 4MB of Level 2 cache. Having more Level 2 cache means that fewer requests need to be made to the system memory – one of the biggest causes of latency.

Intel Board DG45ID motherboard micro ATX iG45

The Intel Desktop Board DG45ID is an Intel G45 Express-based, compact motherboard.Compared to other compact motherboards on the market, it is very expensive at around $1,205.This motherboard supports Celeron, Pentium D, Pentium Dual Core, Core 2, and Xeon processors that use the LGA775 interface.

Pros: Has one IEEE 1394 (FireWire) and six Hi-Speed USB optional connections.This is more favorable than the average motherboard on the market today, but is to be expected for a motherboard of this price.Supports up to 8GB of RAM, which is ideal for memory intensive tasks such as digital video editing or file transfer.In addition you can take advantage of the onboard Firewire (IEEE 1394) to connect to compatible peripherals at high data rates.
Cons: Has a serial ATA-300 storage interface.This is not out of line with the product's price, but is less favorable than the average motherboard on the market today.
(1) Be sure that you are using a LGA775-compatible processor with this motherboard.(2) If you want to take full advantage of the on-board SATA controller, you will want to consider a hard drive upgrade.Existing IDE hard drives will run on the ATA-133 bus.(3) For motherboard add-ons, check out the and section of CNET's website.
CNET's Product Briefs are generated by a software tool that combines product specifications with knowledge of our editorial experts. They do not reflect hands-on assessment or labs testing. For more information about how we create Product Briefs, .
CNET editors' buying advice
We have not reviewed this product but here is CNET's buying advice on Motherboards. This content was chosen based on the features included with this model of motherboard.
Socket LGA775
LGA775 (occasionally called Socket T) is a current processor socket used for Intel desktop processors and has been in use since mid-2004. As such, it is the basis of most current consumer motherboards and supports a variety of processors including versions of the Pentium 4, Pentium D, and Core 2 processors. As actual compatibility with a particular processor is determined by the chipset used on the board, it is still important to check the motherboard's actual compatible processors.

Built-in Graphics
These motherboards feature an on-board graphics processor, alleviating the need to purchase a graphics card. This can be a good choice for a cheaper system that is not expected to need the latest and greatest in graphical processing power. Even better, many of these still have a acceptable graphics card slot on the motherboard, allowing it to be upgraded later.
Not all on-board graphics are alike. Some are versions of actual graphics processors, mounted on the motherboard with built-in video RAM, which can give decent performance; others are integrated graphics solutions, which are built into the main chipset of the board itself. These latter have been getting better, and can provide enough performance for standard office tasks, but still fall far behind any of the dedicated solutions.

Intel DG45ID Motherboard

It's no secret that we're not big fans of integrated graphics solutions. You know, the graphics built into a lot of the low-cost motherboards (and even some of the high-end models), where you plug your monitor right into the back plane and don't need a graphics card.
Integrated graphics just don't perform well enough to be used for "real" gaming (that is, stuff beyond simple Web-based flash games and the like). Intel, and AMD/ATI all make integrated graphics solutions, and while Intel's are the most popular in the marketplace, they're also our least favorite—often slower than the others, with common driver issues that cause games to look wrong or not run at all.

Integrated graphics have their place, though. If you're building a home theater PC or just a plain business box—they'll get the job done. You can save a few bucks and a few watts of power utilization using integrated graphics, and if the IG you have does a good job with video processing, that can be all you need to put together a pretty good home theater PC.
Intel's GMA 3100 and 3500 were not too impressive at the time, but the company promises big improvements in the GMA X4500 HD, debuting in the G45 Express chipset. Today we're taking a look at one of the first shipping Intel-brand motherboards to use this chipset, the DG45ID. We'll focus on graphics performance and features, including video, with the aim of answering one simple question: Did Intel get it right this time

Intel of DG45ID

Intel broke new ground when it launched the GMA X3000 graphics core in the G965 chipset as it was the first Intel graphics core to use Unified Shaders. The next big step was the GMA X3500 core in the G35 chipset which supports Shader Model 4.0 and DirectX 10.0 however you couldn’t really claim that the graphics were up to the job of playing games. Today we’re looking at a pre-release sample of the Intel DG45ID with G45 chipset that uses the GMA X4500HD graphics core and once again Intel has come up with something new.
G45 has had the same 65nm die shrink as the mainstream P45 chipset and Intel has used the space that has been freed up to increase the Unified Shader count from eight to ten. The clock speed of the core has been reduced from 667MHz in the G35 to 533MHz so the amount of graphics power has remained constant (10x533=8x667) but we would expect that the power consumption has been reduced.
You’ll have noticed the HD suffix that Intel has added to the GMA X4500 model code as Intel has worked on the High Definition support in this chipset. Intel has supported hardware decoding of H.264, VC1 and MPEG2 since the introduction of the GMA X3000 core and it maintained the list of features in GMA X3500. With GMA X4500HD it has enhanced support for H.264 HW by adding Motion Compensation and Inverse Transform which were already present and correct for VC1 and MPEG2. The new core also gains Variable Length Decode support for all three codecs and some post processing features such as Non-Linear Anamorphic Scaling that are, frankly, incomprehensible to your reviewer. We get things back on track as we scroll down the list of features when we reach the ports and connectors. Until G45 came along Intel supported HDMI with SDVO or Serial Digital Out connection which is a revision of PCI Express. With the latest graphics core HDMI support is integrated and DisplayPort is added but the really interesting thing is that the DG45ID motherboard has dual digital outputs in the shape of an HDMI port and a DVI-I connector.
As far as we can see there is no change in monitor support from G35 to G45 as they both support dual independent displays with resolutions up to 2,048 x 1,536 so both GPUs can handle 1,920 x 1,080 HD. In the past we’ve only ever seen one digital port and one analogue connection on an Intel motherboard. If you plug in a PCIe graphics card the DVI-I port is disabled so you shouldn’t get carried away with the idea of running four displays on one PC.
This is a thoroughly modern motherboard that doesn’t have any legacy support whatsoever. The graphics outputs are digital, there are no PS/2 ports for mouse or keyboard, the only storage connectors are SATA and eSATA so it’s finally time to ditch your IDE DVD writer with the horrid ribbon cable. The only problem we have with the layout is that Intel has used open chokes around the CPU socket and the capacitors appear to be the old style paper-and-electrolyte design. This suggests that the DG45ID might not have the same long life that you would expect from a recent model from the likes of Asus, Gigabyte or MSI.
Intel has managed to comfortably fit all of the features onto the motherboard despite the fact it is MicroATX. You’d only want the extra room that is provided by the ATX form factor if you intended to install a host of expansion cards and frankly we’re struggling to see how you’d even use the slots that Intel has provided.

Intel Core 2 Extreme QX6700

I still remember the strange looks I used to get from my friends, when I told them I had a computer with two processors. Yet now, PC World is advertising the benefits of Core Duo architecture on nationwide television. Granted it has cringe-worthy references such as “RAM Memory” (Random Access Memory Memory apparently...) and I don't think it explains the benefits of multi-cores properly, but it's an odd feeling to have the masses running what used to be reserved for high end workstations and servers.
Core 2 Duo has been one of the most important launches for Intel in quite some time, really taking back the Desktop market by storm. Yet, even when I was in Germany at a pre-launch briefing of Conroe/Core 2 Duo, Intel suggested that quad core wasn't far off either. In fact, the computer being used for the PowerPoint presentation, was in fact Kentsfield – Intel's code name for its quad core processor. Not particuarly good use of resources, but an excellent demonstration of the state of play.
November has come around, and true to Intel's word, quad-core is here. It seems like only yesterday we were marvelling at the first dual-core solutions, so to have a “quad-core” processor in front of me, seems almost surreal. However, in actuality, this isn't as much of a technological feat as you might think. Eighty cores, as demonstrated at IDF, is...




Above you can see what Kentsfield looks like, before the heat spreader is put on top. This is a very telling picture, as what you can see is two completely separate dies. Conroe is a single die, but two cores working intelligently together, sharing cache and getting things done in an efficient manner.
As you can see above, Intel has basically taken two Core 2 Duo dies and just put them in to one package. I think Intel realises that this is cheating a little and that's why the product name is Core 2 Extreme QX6700, which apart from the subtle “Q”, doesn't mention quad anywhere in the name. This is an Extreme Edition processor, so is naturally expensive, initially priced at $999. This isn't far off the current price of an Core 2 Extreme X6800 (£643), so in comparison, it's pretty good value.
Technically speaking, the fact the cores are in the same package is irrelevant. In order for data to be communicated between the two dies, the data needs to go through the North Bridge, via the Front Side Bus. Essentially, it means the performance will be identical to having two separate processors in two separate sockets.

Intel's approach does have its benefits though. For one, by having all four cores in the same package, there is only one heatsink. Any boards that currently support Core 2 Duo, will support Kentsfield as well. In saying that, we had to update the BIOS on our Gigabyte 965P motherboard, in order to get it to boot. It also makes designing a decent motherboard a lot easier and means we can expect to see quad-core hitting the MicroATX platform.

Intel Core i5 750


The introduction of the Core i7 range of processors late last year was the beginning of the Nehalem family. The processors have had a mixed reception and it is fair to say that although the new series has been impressive performance wise, the pricing was and still is too much for many users. After all, the LGA1366 socket requires not only the processor but also an X58 motherboard and triple channel DDR3 memory. The Core i5’s aim is to offer what the i7’s couldn’t – an affordable mid-range CPU.


The C2D and Pentium processors still make up a significant amount of the market but the Nehalem micro-architecture is expected to take over gradually.As a rule of thumb, the i7 series is high-end intended for hardcore enthusiasts, Core i5 is mid ranged with the Core i3’s (yet to be released) aimed at entry level customers. Without further ado, let’s take a better look at the CPU on offer today. Introducing the Core i5 750.

Intel Core 2 Duo 'Conroe' E6700 and X6800 Benchmarks


IntroductionIf you're like me, you will have been watching all of the news and thread popping up around the Internet surrounding Intel's latest line of processors 'Core 2 Duo'. In particular, their latest core codenamed 'Conroe' for the LGA775 platform.After months of waiting, and being teased by benchmarks from engineering samples, the Conroe chip is now available for purchase from most retailers including our friends over at SpecialTech.So, what's so great about this CPU, why does it perform so well, and will you see a worthwhile performance improvement by upgrading from your current processor? All of these questions I plan to answer today by comparing the E6700 and X6800 'Conroe' chips against my trusty Pentium 4 630 chip clocked at a stock speed of 3ghz.Test SetupIntel were kind enough to send us one of their press kits containing some of their latest goodies...- Intel D975XBX 'Bad Axe' Motherboard- Intel Core 2 Duo E6700 (2.66ghz)- Intel Core 2 Duo X6800 (2.93ghz)In order to get things up and running, I'll be adding the following components to the mix:- Silverstone Zeus 560w PSU- XFX 7900GT GPU @ Stock- Kingston HyperX PC2-8500 (5-5-5-15)- Stock Intel CoolerAnd for a 'fair' clock-for-clock comparison, I'll be adding my very own Pentium4 630 running at a stock speed of 3.0ghz which is just a tad faster on the MHZ scale than the Core 2 Duo's that I'm looking at today.

Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 CPU – E0 stepping

Introduction
If you’ve been a reader of Mods-n-Clocks over the past year or so then you’ll know already that I was a great fan of the budget Intel E2100 series of CPUs and went out and bought a pair of E2160s. They overclocked 80%+ on air cooling and would run everything I could throw at them with relative ease.

However as time has moved on, a year in PCs is a long time after all, it has become apparent that having a quad core processor brings with it many benefits. One of these benefits for example is being able to play GTA:4 in all its glory!
The introduction of the i7 and now i5 series of CPUs has also pushed down the cost of the Q9550 and similar Q9000 series processors. What once cost several hundred pounds can now be bought for around £165. If you still want to pay over the odds there are places offering the old higher prices though. Maplin are selling the Q9550 for £339.99 for example.
Specifications
The Q9550 is a Socket 775 CPU based on the 45nm manufacturing process. It has a default clock speed of 2.83GHz derived from a front side bus speed of 1333MHz (333×4) and a multiplier of 8.5. Level 2 cache on the Q9550 comes in at a massive 12MB.
The most recent revision of the chip is the E0 and this is the one to look out for if you intend on overclocking the chip. There’s a previous revision which is C1 and it’s likely to hit slightly lower maximums when overclocking.

For your benefit, the codes engraved on the chip that refer to the revision are SLB8V for the E0 and SLAWQ for the C1. I should imagine that all the CPUs out in the stores are now E0 revision but be aware if buying second hand that a C1 is a little less valuable. Of course if everyone else is thinking this way too then you might find a C1 revision bargain and it is still a decent Quad Core CPU.
Packaging and Contents
Well what can I say really in this section? It’s all standard Intel box and packaging. In the retail box you get a stock Intel cooler with pre-applied thermal interface media, the processor itself and a variety of leaflets and booklets detailing specs and warranty terms and conditions.
As with all AMD and Intel CPUs this Q9550 is packaged so that it can be seen from outside of the packaging without having to break the seal. This is to help prevent the sale of counterfeit CPUs but it also helps in tracking down the right revision number when buying a brand new CPU. The store should be able to check the details on the CPU for you before you commit to buying.
Installation
Installing the Q9550 is pretty much like installing any 775 socket CPU. One thing that is important to remember is to reset your BIOS settings back to default before installing. For example the 1.5V that you had coursing through your 65nm E2160 to overclock it to 3.3GHz might not go down too well with your new 45nm Q9550. It’s also worth checking while you still have your old CPU in place that your motherboard BIOS version fully supports the new CPU, if not then a BIOS flash will usually sort it out.

As with all Intel 775 CPUs the pins are in the motherboard socket and not the CPU so there’s little chance of bending any pins. Just make sure to position the CPU in the correct orientation, there’s a marked corner for this purpose. Refer to your motherboard manual for more details.
Once the CPU is physically in place you’ll need to either fit the stock cooler or apply some thermal paste and a 3rd party cooler. I already have an Akasa Evo 120 cooler, so that is the one that I have fitted. This might soon change however as you’ll find out further into this review.

Intel's P55 Express chipset


For years, Intel's core-logic chipsets have set the standard against which all others are judged—as long as we're not talking about integrated graphics performance, anyway. You'd have to dig all the way back into the pre-Prescott era for an Intel chipset with serious issues. Finding flaw with relatively recent core-logic offerings from AMD and Nvidia is considerably easier, however. During Intel's reign, AMD's south bridge chips have struggled with all sorts of issues, from slow USB and PCI performance to generally flakey AHCI implementations. Nvidia's nForce designs have had their share of problems, too, like bouts with data corruption and generally higher power consumption.
A relative lack of quirky issues has made Intel chipsets particularly popular among enthusiasts. The mid-range models have been the most iconic, not just because they've offered all the performance and stability of higher-end variants, but because they've generally taken well to overclocking. Such was the case with the P45 Express we've been enjoying for more than a year now, the P35 that came before it, the P965 before that, and so on.
Today, Intel's latest mid-range chipset makes its debut alongside Lynnfield-based Core i5 and i7 processors. Ladies and gentlemen, I present you the P55 Express.


Yep, that's it: one chip. It's not really a chipset, is it? Intel calls this slice of silicon the P55 Express Platform Controller Hub, or PCH. The chip is fabbed using 65-nano process technology, and it's tiny. According to my ruler, the PCH measures just 8.5 x 9 mm for a total die area of around 76.5 mm².
Intel can get away with such a small, single chip because Lynnfield moves much of the chipset's traditional duties onto the CPU. Like its Bloomfield-based Core i7 predecessors, Lynnfield CPUs have integrated memory controllers. You're limited to two DDR3 memory channels, but speeds are supported up to an effective 1333MHz. This latest Nehalem iteration also brings a sweet 16 lanes of second-generation PCI Express connectivity onto the processor package, consolidating CPU and north bridge components under one roof.
Lynnfield's PCI Express lanes can be configured as a single x16 link or split between a pair of x8s for multi-GPU configurations. CrossFire support is universal, but as with Intel's X58 chipset, SLI certification is handled at the motherboard level. All boards should be able to combine a single GeForce graphics card with a second one for dedicated PhysX acceleration, provided they have a second physical x16 slot. You can also add a dedicated PhysX card to an SLI-certified board running a pair of GeForces in tandem. If that wasn't excessive enough, some uber-high-end P55 boards will also feature nForce 200 chips and support for three-way SLI. Such extravagance seems silly given the P55's mid-range aspirations, but that's how mobo makers roll these days.
Lynnfield has enough PCI Express lanes for most graphics configs. What about expansion slots and peripherals, though? That's where the P55 Express PCH comes in. It's equipped with eight gen-two PCIe lanes—two more than the old ICH10R south bridge. However, these lanes only offer signaling rates up to 2.5GT/s, which is the same speed as gen-one PCI Express. That's unlikely to be a major impediment in mid-range systems, but it will limit the bandwidth available to high-end RAID cards, and the like.


Little has changed in the Serial ATA department, however. The P55's six-channel SATA controller is largely the same as the one in the ICH10R, so it's loaded with RAID functionality but lacking support for next-gen 6Gbps transfer rates. Intel says it's looking at the new standard, but that only SSDs are likely to benefit from greater interface bandwidth. Not even today's fastest SSDs can saturate a 3Gbps SATA link, anyway.
On the networking front, the P55 has a Gigabit Ethernet MAC that will consume one of the board's PCI Express lanes if tapped. So much for saving an expansion slot with integrated GigE. Intel has made some changes in the P55's USB component, as well, retaining the dual-controller design while adding two ports for a total of 14. Throw in an HD audio interface, and that just about does it for the P55.
The PCH is linked to the CPU via a 2GB/s DMI interconnect similar to the one Intel used to join the north and south bridge components of its last several chipsets. I suppose that makes sense given that this is still an I/O hub link, but the pipe doesn't look nearly fat enough on paper. The DMI connection's 2GB/s of peak bandwidth is equivalent to just four of the PCH's half-bandwidth PCIe 2.0 lanes. And the P55 PCH has another four of those, plus SATA, USB, and other lesser chipset functions to clog things up. The average mid-range PC is only likely to have a few hard drives and USB peripherals, though, and it probably won't be maxing too many of those PCIe lanes at once.
I have to admire the elegant simplicity of the P55 PCH, but there isn't much to the actual chip. The same can't be said about the first wave of P55-based motherboards to hit the Benchmarking Sweatshop. What the PCH lacks in flash, it makes up for by packing a heck of a lot of connectivity into a very small package, allowing motherboard makers to load up on expansion slots and peripherals to complement their ever-evolving arsenals of overclocking options and useful new features.
That ordnance is on full display in the first wave of P55 boards from the big three: Asus' P7P55D Deluxe, Gigabyte's GA-P55-UD6, and MSI's P55-GD65. Rather conveniently, we've arranged an in-depth throwdown to see how they compare. We'll dive into the results of our exhaustive suite of chipset and motherboard tests in a moment, but first, let's properly introduce these Lynnfield-ready mobos.

Intel DX58SO X58 Express Chipset Motherboard Review

Introduction To The DX58SO
Intel chipset-based motherboards have always been some of the most reliable boards on the market. Not only that, but Intel chipset-based motherboards that are produced by Intel have always been some of the most feature rich and durable boards on the market. Intel could easily sit back for a bit and rest on their laurels, but they don't; they keep pushing ahead with constant innovation. That innovation has brought them to their newest chipset, the Intel X58 Express chipset, and the Intel DX58SO Motherboard. The Intel DX58SO chipset, coupled with the ICH10R southbridge, brings the best and greatest that Intel has to offer to a quality designed motherboard that will bring the end user all the performance, speed and capabilities to make their computing experience all that it can be. Let's take a look at the specs...

Specs
Form factor
ATX (12.00 inches by 9.60 inches [304.80 millimeters by 243.84 millimeters])
Processor
Click View supported processors for the most current list of compatible processors. At product launch, this desktop board supports:
Support for a Intel® Core™ i7 processor in an LGA1366 socket
Memory
Four 240-pin DDR3 SDRAM Dual Inline Memory Module (DIMM) sockets
Support for DDR3 1600 MHz, DDR3 1333 MHzς, DDR3 1066 MHz
Support for up to 16 GB of system memory
Chipset
Intel® X58 Express Chipset
Audio
Intel® High Definition Audio subsystem in the following configuration:
10-channel (7.1) Dolby Home Theater* Audio subsystem with five analog audio outputs and two S/PDIF digital audio outputs (coaxial and optical) using the Realtek* ALC889 audio codec
Video
Nvidia SLI* and ATI CrossFire* multi-GPU platform support enables two graphics cards to work together for ultimate 3D gaming performance and visual quality
Full support of next-generation ATI CrossFire* and Nvidia SLI*
LAN support
Gigabit (10/100/1000 Mbits/sec) LAN subsystem
Peripheral interfaces
Twelve USB 2.0 ports (8 external ports, 2 internal headers)
Six Serial ATA 3.0 GB/s ports, including 2 eSATA port with RAID support supplied by a Marvell* controller
Two IEEE-1394a ports (1 external port, 1 internal header)
Consumer IR receiver and emitter (via internal headers)
Expansion capabilities
One PCI Conventional* bus add-in card connectors (SMBus routed to PCI Conventional bus add-in card connector)
One primary PCI Express* 2.0 x16 (electrical x16) bus add-in card connector
One secondary PCI Express 2.0 x16 (electrical x16) bus add-in card connector
One PCI Express* 1.0a x16 (electrical x4) bus add-in card connector

Intel Core 2 (Conroe) Performance Review


The Pentium is Dead, Long Live The Core!

It has finally happened, Intel will be putting to rest the long standing Pentium branding for their next generation of desktop microprocessors in favor of a totally new line-up simply called Core. However, this isn't just a re-branding exercise for Intel. The Core processors mark Intel's first true major revamp of microprocessor technology since their launch of the NetBurst microarchitecture with the Willamette core Pentium 4 back in the year 2000 and before you know it, we're already at Core 2. Now we're getting ahead of ourselves. Considering the major gear shift at Intel to bring about this day, let's take a brief recap on the chain of events that have lead to the development of the new Core processors.

From the very beginning of the Pentium 4 and the introduction of the deeply pipelined NetBurst microarchitecture, Intel has advocated speed, speed and more speed. The deep 20-stage (which was later increased to 31 stages from the Prescott core onwards) pipeline design and SSE technologies were designed to excel at extremely high frequencies and Intel has previously let known that they predicted the Pentium 4 (90nm Prescott) could scale up to 5GHz. That was back in 2003 and in 2006, we've not seen an officially released NetBurst architecture based processor past the 3.8GHz mark. Intel knowing that frequency scaling has hit a solid wall due to difficulties in controlling the ever increasing thermals and exponentially reduced performance gain, began moving towards parallelism as an answer introducing Hyper-Threading Technology into the Pentium 4 and subsequently the Smithfield dual-core Pentium D was born. The Smithfield was basically two Prescott cores bolted onto one another, which didn't really help reduce neither power consumption nor thermals much. Intel's use of a shared FSB also meant an overall reduced bandwidth to each core, an essential lifeline for NetBurst processors. Intel enhanced their manufacturing process with the 65nm Presler core, increase L2 cache to 4MB (2MB per core) and threw in hardware Virtualization Technology (VT). However, even the Preslers could not shake AMD's steady seat on the performance-per-watt throne and was still putting out too much heat for comfort.AMD's sharp rise in market share from their hugely successful Athlon XP, Athlon 64 and dual-core Athlon 64 X2 processors in the past two years has been a rude awakening for Intel. AMD was even making inroads into the server market with their Opteron products and went as bold as to openly challenge Intel's dual-core Xeon on both performance and power consumption fronts in 2005 - a challenge which Intel chose to ignore resulting in defacto bragging rights for AMD for a period of time.Intel of course has not been sitting idle all this while and we've seen a huge effort in promoting their next generation microarchitecture over the past year, which was basically Intel telling the world 'Wait and see, we'll be back and then we will rock!'. Intel officially unveiled the revolutionary Core microarchitecture early this year at IDF Spring 2006 in San Francisco and wet our lips with a preview of the enhanced power saving features (if not the performance) with the launch of the Core Duo (codenamed Yonah) dual-core mobile processor.It is very important to note that the Core Duo (Yonah) is not a Core microarchitecture based processor, but it is the direct predecessor to some of the technologies that are used in development of Core. The Core version of the mobile processor, currently codenamed Merom will be launched later this year. Today, we will see the launch of the Core 2 Duo and Core 2 Extreme processors (confusing we know, but we guess Intel is still getting into their new groove), Intel's desktop Core lineup previously codenamed Conroe. The table below is a list of the announced Core 2 Duo models, their basic specifications and anticipated pricing and availability:-
Intel Core 2 Duo Processor Details and Price -->
Processor Model / Processor Characteristics
Clock Speed
L2 Cache
Front Side Bus (MHz)
Max TDP (W)
Price (US$)
Availability*
Core 2 Extreme X6800
2.93GHz
4MB
1066
75
$999
July 2006
Core 2 Duo E6700
2.67GHz
4MB
1066
65
$530
July 2006
Core 2 Duo E6600
2.40GHz
4MB
1066
65
$316
July 2006
Core 2 Duo E6400
2.13GHz
2MB
1066
65
$224
July 2006
Core 2 Duo E6300
1.86GHz
2MB
1066
65
$183
July 2006 -->*Approximation Intel will initially launch these five processors in the Core 2 family. The E6300 and E6400 are actually entry-level processors based on the Allendale core with reduced L2 cache of 2MB. The E6600, E6700 and X6800 are all based on the Conroe core with a full 4MB L2 cache. For this review, we will be focusing exclusively on the Conroe processors.

INTEL 5400XS Skulltrail MOBO review

PROLOGUE:
It has been long time back since I started this article. Due to some secure constraints I am not able to complete this. Even now, I was able to get only few pictures of my baby. Rather than waiting for a long time, I have decided to give a shot by divulging the stuffs about Skulltrail with the details I have. It’s hardly possible for me to show you pals the benches and other performance related information since my baby is under a secure zone with restrictions. But, I would illustrate you the product related information and some crucial stuff that Skulltrail features. I will also tell you some difficulties I faced with my workstation. Not for the first time in history, there has always been a tough competition between AMD and INTEL. Its time where AMD started showcasing their QuadFX thingy, INTEL came out with a jaw dropping platform with maximum of 8 cores, SLi and crossfire capability. Before the release of Skulltrail in the market during Feb 2008, AMD played a vital role in their QuadFX platform. INTEL planned for something big. As a result, they came out with an ultimate platform not only for gamers, but also for developers and animators. I would say this is a great turning point in the generation of motherboards. One usual thing that happened was between assembled and company made machine. DELL higher end INSPIRON series and HP products were way too overpriced. As a matter of fact, 90% of people made their move only towards assembling the Skulltrail machines. Chip designers faced a huge problem in designing the north bridge for this motherboard. It’s not an easier task to incorporate two four core processors into a single bridge. Yes, as expected, they did it. They are clever. Their job was considered crucial because they were planning to attack AMD 64 FX-51 by releasing Skulltrail. Because of AMD’s 64 FX-51, INTEL were forced to sell their XEON processors which has a different architecture that features an additional of 2MB L2 cache. This is the reason why Skulltrail has got itself comfortable with XEON. Obviously this motherboard is extensively featured compared with the standard ones and off course the best workstation motherboard. INTEL has done a great job in the perspective of animators and developers, out of them some use ATI and some use NVIDIA. Its capability of handling the SLi and crossfire made a contrast in those periods of motherboard generation. We’ll step into the features of this babe in the coming pages. There are good and bad in all the occasions and things. Skulltrail is not an exception for this global fact. It had its own pros and cons. For instance, fixing the CPU fan is not an easier task in Skulltrail. Off course, third party manufacturers came out with their own model which made the task easy but, during initial stage of setup, Skulltrail has troubled a lot I should say. In spite of these troubles, people used to go mad on the facilities that Skulltrail has and move towards it. High performance and rated products cost high according to many pals. Yes!!! It’s a challenge to buy a Skulltrail and install a 750W SMPS to feed that giant. But it’s always been an immense pleasure in working with it. Many have dream of getting it. Some might have already tasted the juice outta Skulltrail. So, to the pals who are yet to taste this juice, here is the chance to feel the essence of it. Let’s put a halt to this ever boring history and get into the deep discussion of this tempting stuff which everyone wants to have one. Like my previous article, I won’t ask you pals to tie yourself to the seat with a drink to read this write-up. I believe that you folks might have started doing that.

Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 Dual Core Desktop Processor


The Bottom Line
Intel's Core 2 Duo E8400 is probably one of the best overall values currently in the desktop processor market. Sure, it only has two processor cores, but it runs at a fairly high clock speed and its low voltage and thermal output allow for it to be easily overclocked making it perform at levels equivalent to processors costing much more.

Pros

Guide Review - Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 Dual Core Desktop Processor
5/18/08 - Intel's Core 2 Duo lineup of processors have been extremely popular thanks to their strong performance and excellent power profiles. The industry is pushing more for quad processors, but most applications still aren't optimized for using multiple cores. This is where the advantage of the Core 2 Duo lineup shines thanks to its higher clock speeds.
The Core 2 Duo E8400 was one of the first of Intel's 45nm processor lineup. The smaller traces allow the processor to use less power and reduce heat generation. The additional space on the die allows the cache to increase from the previous 4MB of the E6000 series to 6MB. The E8400 uses the newer 1333MHz bus speed to help it transfer data between subsystems faster than the 1066MHz cores. All of this add up to a very fast processor that comes in at a very reasonable


price.
Overall, performance in all applications was quite strong. The only area that the E8400 will really fall behind quad core CPUs is in software programs such as video editing software. In fact, many applications now seem to be limited by other aspects of the systems such as memory, hard drive or GPU where additional cores or high clock speeds won't make much of an impact.
Overclocking the Core 2 Duo E8400 is easy and yields excellent results. When testing the overclocking, the E8400 was boosted by 20% to 3.6GHz by simply modifying the bus from 1333MHz to 1600MHz. This gave a very strong boost in performance and didn't cause much issue with heat even with the stock Intel heatsink. There is room for more with the right combination of cooling and memory.

Primer on 64-bit information and Intel® Extended Memory 64 Technology (Intel® EM64T)

What is the Challenge?
In 2007, the 64-bit computing paradigm and subsequent migration will come into the mainstream desktop and mobile computing marketplace, along with the introduction of Microsoft’s Windows* Vista operating system. The rapid expansion to 64-bit technology will enable “everyday” users to become aware of the 64-bit processing power and thus will no longer be isolated to the high-end workstation or data center environments.As the current 32-bit eco-system evolves into 64-bit architecture, and as subsequent consumer demand grows; developers, administrators and users alike will need to understand what 64-bit technology can offer over their current 32-bit computing environment.
Why is it Important?
By the end of 2006, all Intel® x86 architecture microprocessor products will ship with the Intel® Extended Memory 64 Technology (Intel® EM64T). This means that laptop and desktop platforms will take advantage of performance increase potential that has, until recently, been reserved for the higher end workstation and server platforms.When the release of Microsoft Windows* Vista operating system occurs, Intel will be ready to fully support it and any Windows* based 64-bit applications that are being readied for release across all Intel personal computer microprocessor product lines. Intel will provide the necessary 64-bit software development infrastructure as well. In addition, Intel® EM64T will continue to support other 64-bit operating systems such as Apple* Macintosh Tiger, and the various versions of 64-bit Linux*.In other words, 64-bit architecture will become a mainstream, “matter of fact” hardware feature that is designed to meet the growing demands of the 64-bit software eco-system. Users will need to increase their understanding of this “soon-to-be” ubiquitous computing architecture in order to make informed decisions concerning adoption of this technology.
What is the Solution?
Intel enables users to fully take advantage of the 64-bit architecture by providing hardware enhancements, software development tools and helpful online resources. This “top to bottom” offering enables users a full compliment of capabilities that can help speed up the adoption of the 64-bit compute paradigm.Below is a brief summary of these offerings.Intel® Extended Memory 64 Technology (Intel® EM64T)The Intel® Extended Memory 64 Technology, or Intel® EM64T, is a hardware extension to IA-32 Intel® architecture that allows the processor to run 64-bit programs natively as well as preserve backward compatibility to legacy 32-bit operating systems and applications.The most notable difference or enhancement with Intel® EM64T over the 32-bit architecture observed will be the increase in available address space. A computer running under the IA-32 Intel® architecture can only address 4GB1 of address space, whereas the Intel® EM64T enabled architecture can address up to 1 terabyte (TB) of address space. In addition to the i ncrease in address space addressability, data can now be handled in larger chunks (64 bits as opposed to 32 bits) via widened general purpose registers. Both of these improvements, for certain applications, can increase performance markedly.Increase in address space and data chunk size is not all that Intel® EM64T “brings to the table” with respect to its capability and increased performance potential. As noted above, Intel® EM64T is an extension of the IA-32 Intel® architecture that includes other additions to the Intel® x86 architecture.
These “extensions” include:
Increase in the number of general purpose registers from 8 to 16 (all 64 bits in width).
Increase in the available 128 bit SSE3 registers from 8 to 16.
The ability to zero or “sign extend” unused high order bits when inserted into a general purpose register with a single microcode instruction, which conserves valuable cache space.
These additional architectural extensions increase potential performance for 64-bit operating systems and applications. It broadens the category of application types destined for 64-bit that may otherwise would not use the increase in 64-bit address space.To access more information about Intel® EM64T, please visit this link. For more information on porting applications to Intel® EM64T, please visit this link. Finally, an Intel® EM64T FAQ can be found here.Intel® Software Development Tools for Intel® EM64TIntel® offers a wide range of software development and analysis tools to assist designers, developers, administrators and users in the adoption of Intel® EM64T. These compilers, threading profilers, performance analyzers and performance libraries can increase productivity and shorten the “Time to Market” for 64-bit initiatives. A brief tour of these software development tool offerings follows:64-bit Compilers:Intel® offers two different Intel® EM64T compilers that are recognized as some of the best code optimization tools in the industry. Optimizations for the various Intel® EM64T based processor offerings are unmatched. A 64-bit C++* and FORTRAN* compilers are available both for Microsoft Windows* and Linux* operating systems. These compilers are designed to take full advantage of the Intel® EM64T hardware extensions. For more information, please visit this Compilers link.64-bit Profilers and Analyzers:Intel® Thread Profiler/Analyzer and Vtune™ performance analyzer compliments the 64-bit Intel® compiler tool suite.The Intel® Vtune™ program is a performance analyzer that is EM64T compatible and can quickly analyze code performance and graphs the information. Vtune™ is flexible enough to use for both 64-bit Windows* and Linux* environments, as well as C++*, Java*, and FORTRAN* programming languages. In addition, it can automatically detect the processor f or which it is collecting data. For more information on Vtune™, please visit this VTune™ link.For analyzing threaded code under EM64T, Intel’s Thread Profiler and Analyzer, which are separate extensions to Vtune™, can quickly pinpoint problems and performance bottlenecks. These tools can help identify threading issues such as poor concurrency, too much thread interaction, and synchronization bottlenecks. For more information, please visit this Threading link.64-bit Intel Performance Libraries:Intel offers a wide range of EM64T compatible performance libraries. The purpose for this offering is to supply highly optimized, general purpose functions that will speed up Intel® EM64T architecture based software. These libraries remove the burden of tweaking you code for a particular Intel® architecture or processor offering. These function libraries, if implemented, can greatly increase overall application performance and stability. They are specially designed for each of the Intel architecture offerings (Intel® NetBurst™ and Intel® Core™ Duo) and are adaptable across all Intel microprocessor offerings. These functions include libraries for matrix processing, image processing, and signal processing as well as large data set functions for math, engineering, scientific and financial applications. For more information on these performance libraries, please visit this Performance Library

Intel D201GLY2



The D201GLY2 is the cheapest motherboard-processor combo solution to come out of the Intel stable. Built to the micro ATX form factor, the motherboard is mere 17x17 cm. This combo makes a lot of sense for people building Linux nodes or low power downloading machines. The motherboard comes with an Intel Celeron 220 processor soldered, which means no speed upgrade. The core 2-architecture based processor runs at Jurassic 1.2 GHz on a 533 MHz system bus. Thankfully, the motherboard supports DDR II, but it has single memory slot—so no dual channel for you.Though the motherboard comes from Intel, both the chipsets are from SiS, namely, SiS662. The graphics driver for Windows works well, but with Ubuntu 7.10 and Linux Mint 4.0, we ran into display problems and needed a patch driver for the GUI to work properly.Other features include two SATA ports, one IDE slot, six USB ports, one serial port and one parallel port. A 10/100 Ethernet comes onboard and it has only one PCI slot. Considering the hardware, we didn’t run our usual heavy duty tests, but instead relied on some old ones to do the number crunching. The processor is reasonably fast and can handle three applications simultaneously.Running multimedia, we could see the system suffer a bit when switching between applications. Graphic engines on the motherboard are quite weak and don’t stand a chance when put to gaming. Reasonable resolution movies run fine, but high resolution ones occasionally stutter. The chipsets and processors are passively cooled and when put to task, get really hot. We suggest going for the actively cooled model (D201GLY2A). Priced at Rs 3,300, the D201GLY2 offers excellent value and if you want to build a compact, low cost machine, the 201GLY2 is definitely the solution to go for. However, don’t expect to run games or any other heavy duty application. We suggest this for building a downloading machine, a print server or a file server.

RATINGS
Features : 3
Performance : 3
Build quality : 3.5
Value for Money : 4.5
Overall : 3.5

Specifications
17x17 cm size, Celeron 1.2 GHz, supports DDR II up to 667 MHz, ADI AD1888 Audio (2 channel), 2 SATA ports and 10/100 Ethernet.

Intel 160GB X25-M SSD

When Intel launched its first generation X25-M SSDs last year, they were a hit with performance seekers thanks to their awesome performance. Flash forward to present day and the company has launched its second generation SSD drives under the same model numbers.
As a result you'll need to look at the SSD's model number to determine whether a drive is first generation or second generation. The original 2.5-inch X25-M 160GB SSD had the model number SSDSA2M160G1GC whereas our newer test sample has the model number SSDSA2M160G2GC. The third and fourth last characters ‘G2' signify a newer drive.

Beyond the identical model names the two SSDs differ quite a bit; whereas the memory used by the older drives was produced using a 50nm fabrication process, the newer SSD uses 34nm chips. This shrink allows Intel to pack more memory allowing for larger capacities while also reducing manufacturing costs. Our second generation 160GB test sample costs US $440 compared to almost US $700 (at launch) for the first generation 160GB drive. The newer SSD memory boasts improved flash read and write latencies of 65 and 85 microseconds versus 85 and 115 and also offers faster random 4KB write speeds of 8.6K IOPS (on the 160GB drives) versus 3.3K.

On the performance front we expected these improvements would show only a slight performance improvement and when it came to actual benchmarks, our theories were proved right. Running HDTach 3 the new drive returned an average read speed of 223.5MB/sec, a 5.5MB/sec improvement over the first generation 160GB drive. In terms of load times too, this newer SSD finished our Company of Heroes load test just three seconds quicker than the older drive.

Intel Core i7 and X58 chipset


Introduction

Today sees Intel beat up on none other than itself by officially announcing details of its next-generation microprocessor architecture, dubbed Nehalem.Brought to the desktop under Core i7 nomenclature, three models will be available later on this month.Our first foray into Core i7 country will take an in-depth look at the architecture and supporting chipset, X58. This will be followed, just a little later, with performance numbers comparing it against the best that's currently on offer for the home PC market.Read on to find out what we think of Core i7.

Intel X25-M G2

Last fall, Intel turned the solid state storage world upside down when it released the ground-breaking X25-M, the first drive to offer a combination of fast read and write speeds while using lower-cost multi-level cell (MLC) NAND Flash memory. Since that time, a slew of competitors from Samsung to OCZ have responded with drives that have matched or outperformed Intel on many tests while offering a lower price per gigabyte (Editor's Note: Read about 7 of those competing drives in our High-Speed SSD Roundup).

Although Intel has issued some firmware updates and cut prices a bit, it hasn’t responded with a new drive—until now. With its X25-M G2 (Generation 2), the chipmaker has upped the ante, using a new 34nm process to lower costs and a revamped controller chip to improve performance. Priced at $440, the 160GB X25-M G2 offers good value and blazing read performance, but its write speeds still fall short of some competitors.
Design and Form Factor
The Intel X25-M G2 comes in a standard 2.5-inch form factor and SATA interface. Most notebooks made in the past couple of years support SATA drives, though some ultraportable and thin-and-light systems such as the Lenovo ThinkPad T400s use 1.8-inch drives instead. A 1.8-inch version of the same drive, the X18-M G2, will be available within a few weeks, presumably at a similar price. Before you upgrade, be sure to check your manual.

You won’t spend a lot of time looking at an SSD, so its design isn’t very important. Still, when you spend hundreds of dollars on a high-performance component, you want it to be well built. The X25-M G2’s faux silver casing won’t win any beauty contests, but, unlike some drives we’ve tested that were housed in flimsy plastic, at least it’s protected by metal.

Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400 Processor

Introduction
In March of 2008, Intel released their Core 2 Quad Q9000 series of processors. These were Intel’s long waited 45nm quad-core processors code-named, Yorkfield. The Q9xxx series introduced faster 1333 MHz front side buses, SSE4 and the aforementioned 45nm manufacturing process. The Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400 Processor is one such processor featuring a 2.66 GHz clock speed and 6MB of L2 cache. We’ll check out it’s underlying technologies as well as check see how it fares on the bench after the break.
Specifications
Intel® Core™2 Quad Processor Q9400 (6M Cache, 2.66 GHz, 1333 MHz FSB)
Frequency
2.66 GHz
Front Side Bus
1333 MHz
Cache
6 MB
Product Family
Intel® Core™2 Quad Processor
Code Name
Yorkfield
Intel® 64 Architecture
TRUE
Intel® Virtualization Technology
TRUE
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technology
TRUE
Demand Based Switching
FALSE
Intel® Trusted Execution Technology
TRUE
Execute Disable Bit
TRUE
Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (Intel® SIPP)
TRUE
Mfg Avail
7+ Yrs
Product Status
Launched
Launch Date
Q3′08
Number of Cores
4
Lithography
45 nm
Core Voltage
0.850v – 1.3625v
Max TDP
95 Watts
Tcase
71.4°C
Package Size
37.5mm x 37.5mm
Sockets
LGA775

Reviews | Intel Core 2 Duo E7200

When we speak of heated competition in the computer world, we used to think of two pairs of rival camps: Intel and AMD, and then there were the nice memories of ATI and NVIDIA. After July 2006, it seems the maps have changed as AMD began to fight its still-ongoing two front war like Germany in World War II. Interestingly, this two front war came just at the right time after Germany took over the French capital. Those were the days when the Athlon 64 X2 was owning the Pentium D. Then they tried to blow its way against the east by spending $5.4 billion buying out ATI Technologies. Meanwhile, the other team were getting their acts together and the United States entered the war -- Intel brought in the Core 2 Duo that literally owned AMD in the enthusiast and consumer market. Two years later, Intel continued to floor the gas pedal -- and it's not a gas pedal in just any car -- continuing the cycle of price slashes, new stepping revisions, and lately the arrival of the Penryn 45nm CPUs. Well, here we are, with two vastly different CPUs sitting in our labs right now. Of which one is a so-called 'low end' dual core Wolfdale E7200 CPU (Like dang, I paid $200 for an E6300 back in 2006... this thing is low end? It's faster than an E6600) priced at $133 per 1000 units, and the second is the second best consumer processor from Intel -- the Core 2 Extreme QX9650 retailing for over $1000. Today, we'll look at the Intel Core 2 Duo E7200 Wolfdale CPU and see how much bang you can get for the buck.






Our Intel processor review units came in a UPS medium box from Intel's California headquarters. Using UPS Express Saver, it's by no means slow, in fact it arrived in a day -- it's quite amazing. It's quite a big box; and with tons of paper and bubble packaging inside, our engineering sample CPUs arrived in perfect working condition. Time for the fun, baby.

For us, small black boxes were used to hold these precious units, somewhat reminding me of jewelery. Except the one on the left is something a geek would really want -- look at the Sharpie label on top. We'll take a look at the QX9650 in a couple of weeks from now. Anyways, you'll probably be buying a retail box CPU anyway, so this is just to fuel your curiosity of what reviewers get!




Before we move on, let's have a quick look at the specifications from Intel of the Wolfdale core CPUs, before we go deep in the next section:
- Dual Core- Enhanced Intel Speedstep® Technology- Intel® EM64T 1- Enhanced Halt State (C1E)- Execute Disable Bit 2- Intel® Thermal Monitor 2
sSpec Number: SLAVN / SLAPCCPU Speed: 2.53 GHzPCG: 06Bus Speed: 1066 MHzBus/Core Ratio: 9.5L2 Cache Size: 3 MBL2 Cache Speed: 2.53 GHzPackage Type: LGA775Manufacturing Technology: 45 nmCore Stepping: M0CPUID String: 10676hThermal Design Power: 65WThermal Specification: 74.1°CVID Voltage Range: 0.85V – 1.3625V
Notice that there are two stepping codes (SLAVN and SLAPC) for the Core 2 Duo E7200 according to Intel's website.



CPU-Z screenshot of the Intel Core 2 Duo E7200 processor. Initially, I did find the naming scheme a bit confusing because a T7200 is a Merom mobile CPU, haha. Just remember than the E prefix is always a dual core desktop processor.

Intel Core 2 Extreme QX6700 review: Quad Core is here!

Since the release of Intel’s Conroe micro-architecture, the company has been making waves, massive waves. In terms of performance, Intel washed away main competitor AMD and they have continued to do so during the past three months with the success of their Core 2 Duo and Extreme processor series.

The only counter AMD has been able to come up with so far is to completely slash prices for all their existing processors, making them extremely tempting as well. Nevertheless, the performance of the Core 2 Duo processor range is so compelling, that even die-hard AMD fans have been taking notice.

The Conroe, or as it is better known, the Core 2 Duo, is a Pentium replacement, meaning we will now longer see any new Pentium branded processors. The Pentium 5xx, 6xx and D series are already becoming a thing of the past. So with Intel now focusing all their attention on the Core 2 series, you can expect it to expand quite rapidly.

Currently, there are four Core 2 Duo processors which were released at the initial launch (E6300, E6400, E6600 and E6700). There is also the Core 2 Extreme processor dubbed the X6800, though it offers very little in the way of performance over the E6700. There is said to be four new Core 2 Duo processors on the way that will run on a 1333MHz FSB and will all feature the larger 4MB L2 Cache. They are the E6650, E6750, E6800 and E6850, though we are not here to discuss these processors today. Rather, we are here to examine the new Kentsfield micro-architecture which is based on a quad-core 65nm design.
Step aside dual-core, it is now the time of the quad-core and you better believe it. The new quad-core series consists of the Core 2 Quad Q6600 and the Core 2 Extreme QX6700. Both feature a dual 4MB L2 cache, operate on a 1066MHz FSB, and have a thermal output of 130 watts. However, the Core 2 Quad Q6600 is not scheduled for release until early next year, and so today we will be looking at the more powerful Core 2 Extreme QX6700 version, which Intel had promised to make available this month, humming along to the tune of just 2.66GHz using a cool 1.34 volts of power.
Easily the biggest downfall of the dieing breed of Pentium processors was its thermal output, which was getting quite ridiculous. Therefore the new Kentsfield and Conroe cores were designed not only with performance in mind, but also power consumption and heat output.
Probably the biggest question on the mind of those that have recently upgraded to Intel Core 2 processors is compatibility, will the new Kentsfield processors work with your existing platform? Well the good news is yes, they will. Worst case scenario a BIOS update may be required to support these new desktop processors, according to Intel. These are great news for current Intel users, and it is good to see the continued use of the LGA775 platform, which is still relatively new anyway. The downside in the other hand, and a quite expected one, is that quad-core processors will start selling at well over $800 each, with today's review item, the Core 2 Extreme QX6700 going for a cool $1000 per processor.